think:false on every scored call; the reasoning-strength dial is a system-prompt line, never a think flip.

UTC, Z-stamped. Converted at the pen; see README.md and provenance.json.

Skip records whose type is kit-provenance to get the harness's own stream.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

Answer: PASS

Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each, all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then shuffled together and used as one.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

Answer: PASS

Okay, let's see. The claim is that Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards. The quote says Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each, all below the Seven being deleted, and then the two packs are shuffled together.

Wait, so each pack is 32 cards. If you delete all cards below Seven, that would remove some cards. Let me think. A standard deck has 52 cards, but maybe in this context, each pack is 32 cards already? Wait, the quote says "two packs of thirty-two cards each, all below the Seven being deleted". So each pack is 32 cards, but they delete all cards below Seven. Wait, that might not make sense. Wait, maybe the original packs are standard 52-card decks, but they're using two packs, each of 32 cards? Or maybe each pack is 32 cards, and they delete the ones below Seven. Wait, the wording is a bit confusing.

Wait, the quote says "two packs of thirty-two cards each, all below the Seven being deleted". So each pack is 32 cards. Then they delete all cards below Seven. Wait, but if each pack is already 32 cards, maybe they're using a 32-card deck where each pack has cards from 7 up? Wait, maybe the original packs are standard 52-card decks, but they remove all cards below Seven, which would leave 32 cards per pack. Let me check. A standard deck has 13 ranks (A, 2-10, J, Q, K). If they delete all cards below Seven, that would remove 2,3,4,5,6. So each suit would have 7,8,9,10,J,Q,K,A. That's 8 cards per suit. If there are 4 suits, that's 32 cards. So each pack is 32 cards after deleting the lower ones. Then they take two of those packs and combine them. So 32 + 32 = 64 cards. So the combined deck is 64 cards. Therefore, the claim is correct. The quote says two packs of 32 each, combined into one. So the answer should be PASS.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

The quote states Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each shuffled together, resulting in a combined deck of 64 cards.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

Answer: PASS


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

Answer: PASS


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

The quote states Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each shuffled together, which equals 64 cards total.

preservation: only PASS preserves (got 'PASS')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10

The quote explicitly states that the Ace of any suit counts 11 and the Ten of any suit counts 10, which directly supports the claim that together they count 21.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10

The quote explicitly states that the Ace of any suit counts 11 and the Ten of any suit counts 10, which together sum to 21.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.

The quote states any number from two to six can play, which includes three players, but does not mention that four is the best number in a way that supports the claim's specific wording about three being legal.

preservation: only PASS preserves (got 'FAIL')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.

The quote states any number from two to six can play, which includes three players, but does not mention that four is the best number for three players specifically.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: A Piquet player who ends the game with 48 points is lurched and loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Piquet is played for so much a game of 100 points; but if
the loser has not reached 50 points he is lurched, and loses a double
game.

The quote states that a player who ends the game with fewer than 50 points is lurched and loses a double game, but the claim specifies exactly 48 points, which is not mentioned in the quote.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: A Piquet player who ends the game with 48 points is lurched and loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Piquet is played for so much a game of 100 points; but if
the loser has not reached 50 points he is lurched, and loses a double
game.

The quote states that a player is lurched and loses a double game if they end with fewer than 50 points, but the claim specifies exactly 48 points, which is not supported by the quote.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: A Piquet player who ends the game with 48 points is lurched and loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Piquet is played for so much a game of 100 points; but if
the loser has not reached 50 points he is lurched, and loses a double
game.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes the five suit holds 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.
QUOTE:
_=The Suits.=_ All the dominoes with the same number upon either end
belong to the same suit; the seven bones with a 4 forming the 4 suit;
those with a 6 the 6 suit, and so on. The number of pips in each suit
may be easily remembered by observing that the ace suit has the same
number of pips as the pieces in the set, 28; and that each suit above
the ace has seven pips more than the number of pieces in the set, while
the blank suit has seven pips less, so that each suit progresses in
regular order, seven pips at a time, as shown in the margin.

  Blank  21
  Ace    28
  Deuce  35
  Trey   42
  Four   49
  Five   56
  Six    63

The quote explicitly states that the five suit has 56 pips and the four suit has 49 pips, confirming the claim that the five suit holds 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes the five suit holds 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.
QUOTE:
_=The Suits.=_ All the dominoes with the same number upon either end
belong to the same suit; the seven bones with a 4 forming the 4 suit;
those with a 6 the 6 suit, and so on. The number of pips in each suit
may be easily remembered by observing that the ace suit has the same
number of pips as the pieces in the set, 28; and that each suit above
the ace has seven pips more than the number of pieces in the set, while
the blank suit has seven pips less, so that each suit progresses in
regular order, seven pips at a time, as shown in the margin.

  Blank  21
  Ace    28
  Deuce  35
  Trey   42
  Four   49
  Five   56
  Six    63

The quote explicitly states that the Five suit has 56 pips and the Four suit has 49 pips, confirming the claim that the five suit holds 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes the five suit holds 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.
QUOTE:
_=The Suits.=_ All the dominoes with the same number upon either end
belong to the same suit; the seven bones with a 4 forming the 4 suit;
those with a 6 the 6 suit, and so on. The number of pips in each suit
may be easily remembered by observing that the ace suit has the same
number of pips as the pieces in the set, 28; and that each suit above
the ace has seven pips more than the number of pieces in the set, while
the blank suit has seven pips less, so that each suit progresses in
regular order, seven pips at a time, as shown in the margin.

  Blank  21
  Ace    28
  Deuce  35
  Trey   42
  Four   49
  Five   56
  Six    63


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the house pays 60 on a total of 4, less than the 71 to 1 odds against that total.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6

The quote shows that for a total of 4, the odds against are 71 to 1 while the house pays 60, which directly supports the claim.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the house pays 60 on a total of 4, less than the 71 to 1 odds against that total.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the house pays 60 on a total of 4, less than the 71 to 1 odds against that total.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: A Conquian player wins by laying down eleven cards, one more than the ten he was dealt.
QUOTE:
_=Dealing.=_ Ten cards are dealt to each player in five rounds of two
at a time, and the twenty remaining in the stock are laid upon the
table face down, between the players, but a little to the left of the
dealer. The stock may be slightly spread, to facilitate the process of
drawing cards from it.

_=Objects of the Game.=_The object of each player is to form triplets,
fours, and sequences, by combining the cards dealt him with others
drawn from the stock. These combinations are laid upon the table, face
up, and the player wins the game who first succeeds in laying down
eleven cards in this manner.

The quote explicitly states that a player wins by laying down eleven cards, which is one more than the ten cards dealt.