think:false on every scored call; the reasoning-strength dial is a system-prompt line, never a think flip.

UTC, Z-stamped. Converted at the pen; see README.md and provenance.json.

Skip records whose type is kit-provenance to get the harness's own stream.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

{"answer":"FAIL","grounded":true,"quote":"Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each, all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then shuffled together and used as one."}<|eot|>

JSONDecodeError: Extra data: line 1 column 202 (char 201)


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

Answer: PASS

CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

Decide whether quote alone supports claim.

Quote says two packs of thirty-two cards each, shuffled together and used as one. That's 64 cards. Claim says combined deck of 64 cards. Does quote alone entail? It says two packs of thirty-two cards each... shuffled together and used as one. That implies 64 cards. Is it exact? It says two packs of thirty-two cards each. 32+32=64. So yes.

But does it say combined deck of 64 cards? It says two packs of thirty-two cards each... shuffled together and used as one. That is equivalent. The claim says played with a combined deck of 64 cards. The quote says played with two packs of thirty-two cards each... shuffled together and used as one. That entails 64 cards total. Is that exact entailment? Might be considered PASS.

Numbers must match exactly. Quote says two packs of thirty-two cards each. That's 64. Claim says combined deck of 64 cards. Yes.

Potential nuance: "combined deck of 64 cards" vs "two packs of thirty-two cards each shuffled together". Is that same? Yes.

Verdict PASS.

Why: quote states two 32-card packs shuffled together, which is 64 cards total.

Return JSON.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

{"verdict":"PASS","why":"The quote states two packs of thirty-two cards each are shuffled together, which is 64 cards total."}<|eot|>

JSONDecodeError: Extra data: line 1 column 127 (char 126)


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

Answer: PASS


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

The quote states Bézique uses two packs of thirty-two cards each shuffled together as one, which entails a combined 64-card deck.

preservation: only PASS preserves (got 'PASS')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

The quote states Bézique uses two packs of thirty-two cards each shuffled together as one, which is a combined deck of 64 cards.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10

The quote lists Ace of any suit as 11 and Ten of any suit as 10, which entails the combined count of 21.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10

The quote lists Ace of any suit as 11 and Ten of any suit as 10, which entails their combined count is 21.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.

The quote states any number from two to six can play, making three legal, and that four is the best game.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.

The quote states any number from two to six can play and four is the best game, which entails three players is legal and four is best.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A Piquet player who ends the game with 48 points is lurched and loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Piquet is played for so much a game of 100 points; but if
the loser has not reached 50 points he is lurched, and loses a double
game.

The quote only states that a loser who has not reached 50 points is lurched, it does not establish that a player ending with 48 points is necessarily the loser.

preservation: only PASS preserves (got 'UNCERTAIN')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A Piquet player who ends the game with 48 points is lurched and loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Piquet is played for so much a game of 100 points; but if
the loser has not reached 50 points he is lurched, and loses a double
game.

The quote states a loser who has not reached 50 points is lurched, but it does not alone establish that a player who ends with 48 points is necessarily the loser.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A Piquet player who ends the game with 48 points is lurched and loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Piquet is played for so much a game of 100 points; but if
the loser has not reached 50 points he is lurched, and loses a double
game.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes the five suit holds 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.
QUOTE:
_=The Suits.=_ All the dominoes with the same number upon either end
belong to the same suit; the seven bones with a 4 forming the 4 suit;
those with a 6 the 6 suit, and so on. The number of pips in each suit
may be easily remembered by observing that the ace suit has the same
number of pips as the pieces in the set, 28; and that each suit above
the ace has seven pips more than the number of pieces in the set, while
the blank suit has seven pips less, so that each suit progresses in
regular order, seven pips at a time, as shown in the margin.

  Blank  21
  Ace    28
  Deuce  35
  Trey   42
  Four   49
  Five   56
  Six    63

The quote lists Four 49 and Five 56 and states each suit progresses seven pips at a time, entailing the five suit has 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes the five suit holds 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.
QUOTE:
_=The Suits.=_ All the dominoes with the same number upon either end
belong to the same suit; the seven bones with a 4 forming the 4 suit;
those with a 6 the 6 suit, and so on. The number of pips in each suit
may be easily remembered by observing that the ace suit has the same
number of pips as the pieces in the set, 28; and that each suit above
the ace has seven pips more than the number of pieces in the set, while
the blank suit has seven pips less, so that each suit progresses in
regular order, seven pips at a time, as shown in the margin.

  Blank  21
  Ace    28
  Deuce  35
  Trey   42
  Four   49
  Five   56
  Six    63


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes the five suit holds 56 pips, seven more than the four suit's 49.
QUOTE:
_=The Suits.=_ All the dominoes with the same number upon either end
belong to the same suit; the seven bones with a 4 forming the 4 suit;
those with a 6 the 6 suit, and so on. The number of pips in each suit
may be easily remembered by observing that the ace suit has the same
number of pips as the pieces in the set, 28; and that each suit above
the ace has seven pips more than the number of pieces in the set, while
the blank suit has seven pips less, so that each suit progresses in
regular order, seven pips at a time, as shown in the margin.

  Blank  21
  Ace    28
  Deuce  35
  Trey   42
  Four   49
  Five   56
  Six    63


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the house pays 60 on a total of 4, less than the 71 to 1 odds against that total.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6

The quote gives odds against 4 or 17 as 71 to 1 and house pays 60, but it does not name Chuck-luck, so the claim’s game attribution is not entailed by the quote alone.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the house pays 60 on a total of 4, less than the 71 to 1 odds against that total.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6

The quote does not mention Chuck-luck and gives the odds for 4 or 17 together, not for a total of 4 alone.

preservation: only PASS preserves (got 'FAIL')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the house pays 60 on a total of 4, less than the 71 to 1 odds against that total.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A Conquian player wins by laying down eleven cards, one more than the ten he was dealt.
QUOTE:
_=Dealing.=_ Ten cards are dealt to each player in five rounds of two
at a time, and the twenty remaining in the stock are laid upon the
table face down, between the players, but a little to the left of the
dealer. The stock may be slightly spread, to facilitate the process of
drawing cards from it.

_=Objects of the Game.=_The object of each player is to form triplets,
fours, and sequences, by combining the cards dealt him with others
drawn from the stock. These combinations are laid upon the table, face
up, and the player wins the game who first succeeds in laying down
eleven cards in this manner.

The quote states ten cards are dealt to each player and the player wins by laying down eleven cards, which entails eleven is one more than the ten dealt.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A Conquian player wins by laying down eleven cards, one more than the ten he was dealt.
QUOTE:
_=Dealing.=_ Ten cards are dealt to each player in five rounds of two
at a time, and the twenty remaining in the stock are laid upon the
table face down, between the players, but a little to the left of the
dealer. The stock may be slightly spread, to facilitate the process of
drawing cards from it.

_=Objects of the Game.=_The object of each player is to form triplets,
fours, and sequences, by combining the cards dealt him with others
drawn from the stock. These combinations are laid upon the table, face
up, and the player wins the game who first succeeds in laying down
eleven cards in this manner.

The quote states ten cards are dealt to each player and the player wins by first laying down eleven cards, which entails eleven is one more than the ten dealt.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A Conquian player wins by laying down eleven cards, one more than the ten he was dealt.
QUOTE:
_=Dealing.=_ Ten cards are dealt to each player in five rounds of two
at a time, and the twenty remaining in the stock are laid upon the
table face down, between the players, but a little to the left of the
dealer. The stock may be slightly spread, to facilitate the process of
drawing cards from it.

_=Objects of the Game.=_The object of each player is to form triplets,
fours, and sequences, by combining the cards dealt him with others
drawn from the stock. These combinations are laid upon the table, face
up, and the player wins the game who first succeeds in laying down
eleven cards in this manner.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Spoil Five the ace of hearts is always one of the four best trumps and always ranks third among them.
QUOTE:
In the trump suit the same order of cards is retained, except that four
cards are always the best trumps. These are the Five, Jack, and ace of
the suit itself, and the ace of hearts, the latter being always the
third best. This gives us the rank of the cards as follows, when the
suit is trump:--

The quote states the four best trumps are Five, Jack, ace of the suit, and ace of hearts, and that the ace of hearts is always the third best.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Spoil Five the ace of hearts is always one of the four best trumps and always ranks third among them.
QUOTE:
In the trump suit the same order of cards is retained, except that four
cards are always the best trumps. These are the Five, Jack, and ace of
the suit itself, and the ace of hearts, the latter being always the
third best. This gives us the rank of the cards as follows, when the
suit is trump:--

The quote states the four best trumps are always Five, Jack, ace of the suit, and ace of hearts, with ace of hearts always the third best.

preservation: only PASS preserves (got 'PASS')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Spoil Five the ace of hearts is always one of the four best trumps and always ranks third among them.
QUOTE:
In the trump suit the same order of cards is retained, except that four
cards are always the best trumps. These are the Five, Jack, and ace of
the suit itself, and the ace of hearts, the latter being always the
third best. This gives us the rank of the cards as follows, when the
suit is trump:--


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A game of Backgammon is played with thirty men in all, fifteen to each of the two players.
QUOTE:
Backgammon is played by two persons, each of whom is provided with
fifteen men, two dice, and a dice-box. The men on each side are of
different colours, black and white, and the players are distinguished
by the colour of the men with which they play. The board is divided
into two tables, _=inner=_ and _=outer=_, and at the beginning of the
game the men may be set up in either of the positions shown in the
diagram.

The quote states Backgammon is played by two persons each provided with fifteen men, which entails thirty men total, fifteen per player.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A game of Backgammon is played with thirty men in all, fifteen to each of the two players.
QUOTE:
Backgammon is played by two persons, each of whom is provided with
fifteen men, two dice, and a dice-box. The men on each side are of
different colours, black and white, and the players are distinguished
by the colour of the men with which they play. The board is divided
into two tables, _=inner=_ and _=outer=_, and at the beginning of the
game the men may be set up in either of the positions shown in the
diagram.

The quote states the game is played by two persons each provided with fifteen men, which entails thirty men in total, fifteen per player.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: A game of Backgammon is played with thirty men in all, fifteen to each of the two players.
QUOTE:
Backgammon is played by two persons, each of whom is provided with
fifteen men, two dice, and a dice-box. The men on each side are of
different colours, black and white, and the players are distinguished
by the colour of the men with which they play. The board is divided
into two tables, _=inner=_ and _=outer=_, and at the beginning of the
game the men may be set up in either of the positions shown in the
diagram.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Piquet a trump suit is fixed before the play begins, and trumps beat all plain suits.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Piquet is played with a pack of thirty-two cards, all below
the Seven being deleted. The cards rank: A K Q J 10 9 8 7, the Ace
being the highest both in cutting and in play. There is no trump in
Piquet, and all suits are equal in value. Two packs are sometimes used,
one by each player in his proper turn to deal.

The quote explicitly states there is no trump in Piquet and all suits are equal, contradicting the claim that a trump suit is fixed and beats plain suits.

kill: catch iff verdict != PASS (got 'FAIL')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Piquet a trump suit is fixed before the play begins, and trumps beat all plain suits.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Piquet is played with a pack of thirty-two cards, all below
the Seven being deleted. The cards rank: A K Q J 10 9 8 7, the Ace
being the highest both in cutting and in play. There is no trump in
Piquet, and all suits are equal in value. Two packs are sometimes used,
one by each player in his proper turn to deal.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Piquet a trump suit is fixed before the play begins, and trumps beat all plain suits.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Piquet is played with a pack of thirty-two cards, all below
the Seven being deleted. The cards rank: A K Q J 10 9 8 7, the Ace
being the highest both in cutting and in play. There is no trump in
Piquet, and all suits are equal in value. Two packs are sometimes used,
one by each player in his proper turn to deal.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Bézique a player must follow suit to the card led so long as cards remain in the stock.
QUOTE:
_=METHOD OF PLAYING.=_ The pone begins by leading any card he chooses,
to which his adversary may play any card he pleases. A player is not
obliged to follow suit, nor to trump; but may renounce or trump at
pleasure until the stock is exhausted, after which the method of play
undergoes a change. If a player follows suit, the higher card wins the
trick, and if identical cards are played to the same trick, such as two
Jacks of clubs, the leader wins. Trumps win plain suits. The winner of
the trick takes in the cards, turning them face down; but before he
leads for the next trick he has the privilege of announcing and scoring
any one of certain combinations that he may hold in his hand. After,
or in the absence of any such announcement, and before leading for
the next trick, he draws a card from the top of the stock and places
it in his hand, without showing or naming it. His adversary draws the
next card, so that each player restores the number of cards in his
hand to eight. This method of drawing from the stock is open to many
objections, and in France the pone always draws first, no matter who
wins the trick.

The quote explicitly states a player is not obliged to follow suit until the stock is exhausted, contradicting the claim that a player must follow suit while cards remain in the stock.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Bézique a player must follow suit to the card led so long as cards remain in the stock.
QUOTE:
_=METHOD OF PLAYING.=_ The pone begins by leading any card he chooses,
to which his adversary may play any card he pleases. A player is not
obliged to follow suit, nor to trump; but may renounce or trump at
pleasure until the stock is exhausted, after which the method of play
undergoes a change. If a player follows suit, the higher card wins the
trick, and if identical cards are played to the same trick, such as two
Jacks of clubs, the leader wins. Trumps win plain suits. The winner of
the trick takes in the cards, turning them face down; but before he
leads for the next trick he has the privilege of announcing and scoring
any one of certain combinations that he may hold in his hand. After,
or in the absence of any such announcement, and before leading for
the next trick, he draws a card from the top of the stock and places
it in his hand, without showing or naming it. His adversary draws the
next card, so that each player restores the number of cards in his
hand to eight. This method of drawing from the stock is open to many
objections, and in France the pone always draws first, no matter who
wins the trick.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Bézique a player must follow suit to the card led so long as cards remain in the stock.
QUOTE:
_=METHOD OF PLAYING.=_ The pone begins by leading any card he chooses,
to which his adversary may play any card he pleases. A player is not
obliged to follow suit, nor to trump; but may renounce or trump at
pleasure until the stock is exhausted, after which the method of play
undergoes a change. If a player follows suit, the higher card wins the
trick, and if identical cards are played to the same trick, such as two
Jacks of clubs, the leader wins. Trumps win plain suits. The winner of
the trick takes in the cards, turning them face down; but before he
leads for the next trick he has the privilege of announcing and scoring
any one of certain combinations that he may hold in his hand. After,
or in the absence of any such announcement, and before leading for
the next trick, he draws a card from the top of the stock and places
it in his hand, without showing or naming it. His adversary draws the
next card, so that each player restores the number of cards in his
hand to eight. This method of drawing from the stock is open to many
objections, and in France the pone always draws first, no matter who
wins the trick.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Calabrasella a misdeal costs the offender the deal, which passes to the player on his left.
QUOTE:
_=Dealing.=_ The cards are presented to the pone to be cut, and at
least four must be left in each packet. The dealer then distributes
them to the players four at a time, until each has twelve, four
remaining in the stock or talon, which is left upon the table face
down. No trump is turned. The deal passes to the left.

There are no misdeals. If the cards are not properly distributed, or
four cards are not left in the talon, the same dealer must deal again,
without penalty.

The quote states there are no misdeals and an improper deal is redone by the same dealer without penalty, contradicting the claim that a misdeal costs the offender the deal.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Calabrasella a misdeal costs the offender the deal, which passes to the player on his left.
QUOTE:
_=Dealing.=_ The cards are presented to the pone to be cut, and at
least four must be left in each packet. The dealer then distributes
them to the players four at a time, until each has twelve, four
remaining in the stock or talon, which is left upon the table face
down. No trump is turned. The deal passes to the left.

There are no misdeals. If the cards are not properly distributed, or
four cards are not left in the talon, the same dealer must deal again,
without penalty.

The quote states there are no misdeals and that an improper distribution requires the same dealer to deal again without penalty, contradicting a cost to the offender.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Calabrasella a misdeal costs the offender the deal, which passes to the player on his left.
QUOTE:
_=Dealing.=_ The cards are presented to the pone to be cut, and at
least four must be left in each packet. The dealer then distributes
them to the players four at a time, until each has twelve, four
remaining in the stock or talon, which is left upon the table face
down. No trump is turned. The deal passes to the left.

There are no misdeals. If the cards are not properly distributed, or
four cards are not left in the talon, the same dealer must deal again,
without penalty.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Conquian a card drawn from the stock is taken into the player's hand until he can use it.
QUOTE:
_=Method of Playing.=_ The cards dealt, each player sorts his hand into
sequences and triplets, and determines what cards he wants to complete
his runs, so that he may be on the lookout for them. The pone then
draws the top card from the stock and turns it face up on the pack. If
this card can be used in combination with any of those in his hand, he
draws it over to his side of the table, and takes from his hand the
cards completing the combination of three cards, leaving them all face
up. Even if he has cards enough in his hand to increase the combination
to four or more cards, he should not show them. The cards drawn from
the stock must never be taken into the hand.

The quote explicitly states "The cards drawn from the stock must never be taken into the hand," which contradicts the claim that a drawn card is taken into the hand.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Conquian a card drawn from the stock is taken into the player's hand until he can use it.
QUOTE:
_=Method of Playing.=_ The cards dealt, each player sorts his hand into
sequences and triplets, and determines what cards he wants to complete
his runs, so that he may be on the lookout for them. The pone then
draws the top card from the stock and turns it face up on the pack. If
this card can be used in combination with any of those in his hand, he
draws it over to his side of the table, and takes from his hand the
cards completing the combination of three cards, leaving them all face
up. Even if he has cards enough in his hand to increase the combination
to four or more cards, he should not show them. The cards drawn from
the stock must never be taken into the hand.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Conquian a card drawn from the stock is taken into the player's hand until he can use it.
QUOTE:
_=Method of Playing.=_ The cards dealt, each player sorts his hand into
sequences and triplets, and determines what cards he wants to complete
his runs, so that he may be on the lookout for them. The pone then
draws the top card from the stock and turns it face up on the pack. If
this card can be used in combination with any of those in his hand, he
draws it over to his side of the table, and takes from his hand the
cards completing the combination of three cards, leaving them all face
up. Even if he has cards enough in his hand to increase the combination
to four or more cards, he should not show them. The cards drawn from
the stock must never be taken into the hand.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes, if both players draw dominoes of the same weight and neither is a double, they shuffle and draw again.
QUOTE:
_=Shuffling and Cutting.=_ Dominoes are provided with a small brass
pin in the centre of the face, which enables one to spin them round,
push them about on the table, and so to shuffle them thoroughly. There
are three methods of determining who shall have the first play, or
_=set=_, as it is called: _=1.=_ The player having the higher double;
or, failing any double in either hand, the _=heavier=_ domino, that
is, one with a greater number of pips on its face than any held by his
adversary. _=2.=_ One player selects any two dominoes, face down, and
pushes them toward his adversary, who chooses one. Both are then turned
up, and whichever gets the lighter domino has the first set. _=3.=_
Each player draws a domino, face down, and the one getting the lower
double sets first. If neither draws a double the lighter domino sets.

The quote describes who sets first when doubles are drawn or when a lighter domino is drawn, but it does not mention a tie in weight with no doubles or a reshuffle and redraw.

kill: catch iff verdict != PASS (got 'UNCERTAIN')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes, if both players draw dominoes of the same weight and neither is a double, they shuffle and draw again.
QUOTE:
_=Shuffling and Cutting.=_ Dominoes are provided with a small brass
pin in the centre of the face, which enables one to spin them round,
push them about on the table, and so to shuffle them thoroughly. There
are three methods of determining who shall have the first play, or
_=set=_, as it is called: _=1.=_ The player having the higher double;
or, failing any double in either hand, the _=heavier=_ domino, that
is, one with a greater number of pips on its face than any held by his
adversary. _=2.=_ One player selects any two dominoes, face down, and
pushes them toward his adversary, who chooses one. Both are then turned
up, and whichever gets the lighter domino has the first set. _=3.=_
Each player draws a domino, face down, and the one getting the lower
double sets first. If neither draws a double the lighter domino sets.

The quote describes who sets first when a lower double or lighter domino is drawn but does not mention a tie of equal weight or a reshuffle and redraw.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In dominoes, if both players draw dominoes of the same weight and neither is a double, they shuffle and draw again.
QUOTE:
_=Shuffling and Cutting.=_ Dominoes are provided with a small brass
pin in the centre of the face, which enables one to spin them round,
push them about on the table, and so to shuffle them thoroughly. There
are three methods of determining who shall have the first play, or
_=set=_, as it is called: _=1.=_ The player having the higher double;
or, failing any double in either hand, the _=heavier=_ domino, that
is, one with a greater number of pips on its face than any held by his
adversary. _=2.=_ One player selects any two dominoes, face down, and
pushes them toward his adversary, who chooses one. Both are then turned
up, and whichever gets the lighter domino has the first set. _=3.=_
Each player draws a domino, face down, and the one getting the lower
double sets first. If neither draws a double the lighter domino sets.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Écarté a player who reaches five points before his adversary has scored at all wins a double game.
QUOTE:
_=MARKERS.=_ In France, the game is always marked with the ordinary
round chips or counters, never with a marker. As five points is the
game, four of these counters are necessary for each player.

The quote discusses marking with counters and that five points is the game, but it does not mention a double game or the condition of the adversary scoring zero.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Écarté a player who reaches five points before his adversary has scored at all wins a double game.
QUOTE:
_=MARKERS.=_ In France, the game is always marked with the ordinary
round chips or counters, never with a marker. As five points is the
game, four of these counters are necessary for each player.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Écarté a player who reaches five points before his adversary has scored at all wins a double game.
QUOTE:
_=MARKERS.=_ In France, the game is always marked with the ordinary
round chips or counters, never with a marker. As five points is the
game, four of these counters are necessary for each player.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Spoil Five the player who takes the first deal also leads to the first trick.
QUOTE:
_=CUTTING.=_ This is unknown at Spoil Five. The players take their
seats at random, and one of them deals a card face up to each in
succession. The first Jack takes the first deal. Some note should be
made of the player who gets the first deal, as the rules require that
when the game is brought to an end the last deal shall be made by the
player on the right of the first dealer.

The quote describes how the first deal is determined and who makes the last deal, but it does not mention who leads to the first trick.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Spoil Five the player who takes the first deal also leads to the first trick.
QUOTE:
_=CUTTING.=_ This is unknown at Spoil Five. The players take their
seats at random, and one of them deals a card face up to each in
succession. The first Jack takes the first deal. Some note should be
made of the player who gets the first deal, as the rules require that
when the game is brought to an end the last deal shall be made by the
player on the right of the first dealer.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Spoil Five the player who takes the first deal also leads to the first trick.
QUOTE:
_=CUTTING.=_ This is unknown at Spoil Five. The players take their
seats at random, and one of them deals a card face up to each in
succession. The first Jack takes the first deal. Some note should be
made of the player who gets the first deal, as the rules require that
when the game is brought to an end the last deal shall be made by the
player on the right of the first dealer.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Piquet the twelve cards are always dealt two at a time.
QUOTE:
_=DEALING.=_ The cards shuffled, they are presented to the pone to be
cut, and at least two cards must be left in each packet. Twelve cards
are dealt to each player, either two or three at a time; but whichever
method is first selected must be maintained throughout the game. In
England the cards are always dealt by twos. No trump is turned. The
remaining eight cards are placed face downward on the table, the five
top cards being laid crosswise on the three at the bottom. These eight
cards are called the _=talon=_ or stock. Each player deals in turn.

The quote states twelve cards may be dealt either two or three at a time and only says dealing is always by twos in England, not universally in Piquet.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Piquet the twelve cards are always dealt two at a time.
QUOTE:
_=DEALING.=_ The cards shuffled, they are presented to the pone to be
cut, and at least two cards must be left in each packet. Twelve cards
are dealt to each player, either two or three at a time; but whichever
method is first selected must be maintained throughout the game. In
England the cards are always dealt by twos. No trump is turned. The
remaining eight cards are placed face downward on the table, the five
top cards being laid crosswise on the three at the bottom. These eight
cards are called the _=talon=_ or stock. Each player deals in turn.

The quote states twelve cards may be dealt either two or three at a time and only says cards are always dealt by twos in England, not universally in Piquet.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Piquet the twelve cards are always dealt two at a time.
QUOTE:
_=DEALING.=_ The cards shuffled, they are presented to the pone to be
cut, and at least two cards must be left in each packet. Twelve cards
are dealt to each player, either two or three at a time; but whichever
method is first selected must be maintained throughout the game. In
England the cards are always dealt by twos. No trump is turned. The
remaining eight cards are placed face downward on the table, the five
top cards being laid crosswise on the three at the bottom. These eight
cards are called the _=talon=_ or stock. Each player deals in turn.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: The forty-card Conquian pack is made by discarding the King, Queen and Jack of each suit.
QUOTE:
_=Cards.=_ Conquian is played with the Spanish pack, forty cards, the
8 9 10 of each suit being deleted. In America, it is much more common
to play with a pack of forty cards from which the three court cards, K
Q J, have been discarded, leaving each suit an unbroken sequence from
the Ace to the Ten. Some persons play with the full pack, but it spoils
the game; as it is then possible to win on a sequence of a single suit.
There are no trumps, and the cards have no value as to rank, a sequence
of 6 7 J being no better than one of 2 3 4. The Ace is not in sequence
with the King.

The quote states a forty-card Conquian pack can also be made by deleting 8 9 10 in the Spanish pack, so the pack is not made solely by discarding K Q J.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: The forty-card Conquian pack is made by discarding the King, Queen and Jack of each suit.
QUOTE:
_=Cards.=_ Conquian is played with the Spanish pack, forty cards, the
8 9 10 of each suit being deleted. In America, it is much more common
to play with a pack of forty cards from which the three court cards, K
Q J, have been discarded, leaving each suit an unbroken sequence from
the Ace to the Ten. Some persons play with the full pack, but it spoils
the game; as it is then possible to win on a sequence of a single suit.
There are no trumps, and the cards have no value as to rank, a sequence
of 6 7 J being no better than one of 2 3 4. The Ace is not in sequence
with the King.

The quote describes a Spanish forty-card Conquian pack made by deleting 8 9 10, and only says the American forty-card pack is commonly made by discarding K Q J, so the claim is not entailed as a universal rule.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: The forty-card Conquian pack is made by discarding the King, Queen and Jack of each suit.
QUOTE:
_=Cards.=_ Conquian is played with the Spanish pack, forty cards, the
8 9 10 of each suit being deleted. In America, it is much more common
to play with a pack of forty cards from which the three court cards, K
Q J, have been discarded, leaving each suit an unbroken sequence from
the Ace to the Ten. Some persons play with the full pack, but it spoils
the game; as it is then possible to win on a sequence of a single suit.
There are no trumps, and the cards have no value as to rank, a sequence
of 6 7 J being no better than one of 2 3 4. The Ace is not in sequence
with the King.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Bézique a loser who has not reached 500 points loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Bézique is played for so much a game, 1,000 points up; or
for so much a point, the score of the loser being deducted from that of
the winner. When a partie of five games is agreed upon, it is usual to
have an extra stake upon the odd game, and when three games have been
won by the same player, the partie is at an end. It is usual to count
it a double game if the loser has not reached 500 points.

The quote states it is usual to count the game as a double game if the loser has not reached 500 points, which entails the loser loses a double game under that condition.

kill: catch iff verdict != PASS (got 'PASS')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Bézique a loser who has not reached 500 points loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Bézique is played for so much a game, 1,000 points up; or
for so much a point, the score of the loser being deducted from that of
the winner. When a partie of five games is agreed upon, it is usual to
have an extra stake upon the odd game, and when three games have been
won by the same player, the partie is at an end. It is usual to count
it a double game if the loser has not reached 500 points.

The quote states it is usual to count it a double game if the loser has not reached 500 points, which entails the claim that such a loser loses a double game.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Bézique a loser who has not reached 500 points loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Bézique is played for so much a game, 1,000 points up; or
for so much a point, the score of the loser being deducted from that of
the winner. When a partie of five games is agreed upon, it is usual to
have an extra stake upon the odd game, and when three games have been
won by the same player, the partie is at an end. It is usual to count
it a double game if the loser has not reached 500 points.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six a royal marriage counts 40 and a marriage in a plain suit counts 30.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10

The quote states a marriage in a plain suit counts 20, not 30, contradicting the claim.

kill: catch iff verdict != PASS (got 'FAIL')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six a royal marriage counts 40 and a marriage in a plain suit counts 30.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six a royal marriage counts 40 and a marriage in a plain suit counts 30.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the odds against a total of 9 are 9¼ to 1 and the house pays 6.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6

The quote lists odds against 9 or 12 as 7¼ to 1 with house paying 6, while odds against 8 or 13 are 9¼ to 1.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the odds against a total of 9 are 9¼ to 1 and the house pays 6.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6

The quote lists odds against 9 or 12 as 7¼ to 1 with house paying 6, while odds of 9¼ to 1 are given for 8 or 13.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: medium

[User]
CLAIM: At Chuck-luck the odds against a total of 9 are 9¼ to 1 and the house pays 6.
QUOTE:
The percentage of the house, even in a square game, may be seen from
the following table, which gives the odds against the event, and the
odds which the house pays:--

  The odds against  3 or 18 are 215  to 1; the house pays 180
         ”          4  ” 17  ”   71  ”  1        ”         60
         ”          5  ” 16  ”   35  ”  1        ”         29
         ”          6  ” 15  ”   20½ ”  1        ”         18
         ”          7  ” 14  ”   13¼ ”  1        ”         12
         ”          8  ” 13  ”    9¼ ”  1        ”          8
         ”          9  ” 12  ”    7¼ ”  1        ”          6
         ”         10  ” 11  ”    7  ”  1        ”          6


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

The quote states Bézique uses two packs of thirty-two cards each shuffled together as one, which entails a combined 64-card deck.

preservation: only PASS preserves (got 'PASS')


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.

The quote states Bézique uses two 32-card packs shuffled together as one, which is 64 cards total.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: Bézique is played with a combined deck of 64 cards.
QUOTE:
_=CARDS.=_ Bézique is played with two packs of thirty-two cards each,
all below the Seven being deleted, and the two packs being then
shuffled together and used as one. It is better to have both packs
of the same colour and pattern, but it is not absolutely necessary.
The cards rank, A 10 K Q J 9 8 7; the Ace being the highest, both in
cutting and in play.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10

The quote is about the game Sixty-six and lists Ace of any suit as 11 and Ten of any suit as 10, which entails the two together count 21.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10

The quote lists Ace of any suit as 11 and Ten of any suit as 10 in the game of Sixty-six, which entails the two together count 21.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: In Sixty-six the Ace of a suit counts 11 and the Ten counts 10, so the two together count 21.
QUOTE:
A player may reach sixty-six by winning tricks containing certain
counting cards; by holding and announcing marriages, which are the King
and Queen of any suit; and by winning the last trick.

The various counts for these are as follows:--

  For King and Queen of trumps, _=Royal Marriage=_,      40
  For King and Queen of any plain suit, _=Marriage=_,    20
  For the Ace of any suit,                               11
  For the Ten of any suit,                               10
  For the King of any suit,                               4
  For the Queen of any suit,                              3
  For the Jack of any suit,                               2
  For the last or twelfth trick,                         10


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.

The quote states any number from two to six can play and four is the best game, so three players is allowed and four is best.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: A table of three players is a legal game of Napoleon, though four is the best number.
QUOTE:
_=PLAYERS.=_ Any number from two to six can play; but four is the best
game. If five or six play it is usual for the dealer to give himself no
cards.


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: A Piquet player who ends the game with 48 points is lurched and loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Piquet is played for so much a game of 100 points; but if
the loser has not reached 50 points he is lurched, and loses a double
game.

JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)


[System]
You are a grounding judge for a rulebook. You will be given a CLAIM and a QUOTE from the rulebook. Decide whether the quote alone supports the claim.
Answer with ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict":"PASS"|"FAIL"|"UNCERTAIN","why":"<one sentence>"}
Rules: PASS only if the quote alone entails the claim exactly as stated. FAIL if the quote contradicts it. UNCERTAIN if the quote neither supports nor contradicts it. World knowledge must never rescue a claim the quote does not support. Numbers must match exactly.
Reasoning strength: high

[User]
CLAIM: A Piquet player who ends the game with 48 points is lurched and loses a double game.
QUOTE:
_=STAKES.=_ Piquet is played for so much a game of 100 points; but if
the loser has not reached 50 points he is lurched, and loses a double
game.