THE ONE DEVIATION. This exam is an older, separately frozen instrument and ran at ITS OWN registered settings - a 16,384-token context and no think flag at all - where every other instrument in this battery ran 32,768 with think:false explicit. The options block on every record below is unaltered and is the receipt for that disclosure.

UTC, Z-stamped. Converted at the pen; see README.md and provenance.json.

Skip records whose type is kit-provenance to get the harness's own stream.


num_predict:10 -> eval_count=10, done_reason='length'


the judge-exam fixture store/judge-cases-v1.json


The source text qualifies the claim with 'perhaps', while the statement presents it as a definitive fact.

fence_stripped=True; content[135 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text qualifies the claim with \'perhaps\', while the statement presents it as a definitive fact."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[155 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states the rotaries were retired in 1964, not 1965, and contains no mention of 2001 or a ceremonial clearing."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[183 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states the third floor was built circa 1902-1903 and that the dome was left intact, contradicting the claim that both were added in 1908."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[158 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text only mentions that something was transported on rollers and does not mention the year 1908, horses, or capstans."}'


The source text does not mention the person's name, the date, the location, or the specific circumstances of the death.

fence_stripped=True; content[149 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the person\'s name, the date, the location, or the specific circumstances of the death."}'


The source text explicitly states that Alaska's oldest hotel closed in 2002.

fence_stripped=True; content[106 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that Alaska\'s oldest hotel closed in 2002."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[132 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention Soapy, the date May 1898, or the duration of time the parlor was run."}'


done_reason='length' (not 'stop'): the model stopped for some reason other than finishing, so whatever text arrived is a fragment, not an answer

*   Source Text: "purchased this two-story wood frame store at Fifth and Broadway (built in 1899) in 1903 and remodelled the structure that winter. In February 1904 he opened Kirmse's Jewelry Store... In 1906 he expanded into the adjacent structure (formerly A. Laska's Cigar Factory)"
    *   Statement: "Corner building built 1899, Kirmse bought it 1903, reopened Feb 1904, expanded 1906 into the former A. Laska's Cigar Factory"

    *   "Corner building": The text says "at Fifth and Broadway". Usually, an intersection implies a corner, but does it *explicitly* say it's a corner building?
    *   "built 1899": Text says "(built in 1899)". (Match)
    *   "Kirmse bought it 1903": Text says "purchased... in 1903". (Match - assuming "he" is Kirmse, which is implied by "opened Kirmse's Jewelry Store").
    *   "reopened Feb 1904": Text says "In February 1904 he opened Kirmse's Jewelry Store". (Match - "opened" vs "reopened" is slightly different, but he remodelled it first, so opening the store in that building is consistent).
    *   "expanded 1906 into the former A. Laska's Cigar Factory": Text says "In 1906 he expanded into the adjacent structure (formerly A. Laska's Cigar Factory)". (Match)

    *   The statement calls it a "Corner building".
    *   The source text says "at Fifth and Broadway".
    *   Does "at Fifth and Broadway" *necessarily* mean it is a corner building? Not necessarily. It could be next to the corner.
    *   However, in common parlance, "at [Street] and [Street]" often refers to the corner. But the prompt says "Answer PASS only if every part of the statement is stated by the source text, or follows necessarily from it."
    *   Is "Corner building" explicitly stated? No.
    *   Does it follow *necessarily*? No. A building "at Fifth and Broadway" could be on either street, just near the intersection.

    *   "reopened Feb 1904": The text says he "opened Kirmse's Jewelry Store". It doesn't say he "reopened" the building. He remodelled the structure and then opened the store. "Reopened" usually implies it was open, closed, and then opened again. Here, he bought a store (which might have been a store) and opened *his* store.

    *   "Corner building": Not explicitly stated.
    *   "reopened": The text says "opened".

    Let's re-evaluate "Corner building". If a building is "at Fifth and Broadway", is it a corner building? In many contexts, yes. In a strict logical context, no.
    Let's re-evaluate "reopened". He remodelled the structure and then opened the store.

    If I have to be strict:
    - "Corner building" is an inference.
    - "reopened" is a slight deviation from "opened".

    Wait, looking at the source text: "purchased this two-story wood frame store at Fifth and Broadway".
    If it's a "store at Fifth and Broadway", it's highly likely a corner, but not guaranteed.

    Let's check the "reopened" part again. "In February 1904 he opened Kirmse's Jewelry Store". The statement says "reopened Feb 1904". This is a discrepancy.

    Verdict: FAIL.

    Why? The source text does not explicitly state it is a "corner building" nor does it use the word "reopened".

    Wait, let me double-check if "at Fifth and Broadway" is sufficient for "Corner building". Usually, in these types of tests, "at [Street] and [Street]" is treated as a corner. But "reopened" vs "opened" is a more distinct difference.

    Actually, looking at the text: "purchased this... store... in 1903 and remodelled the structure... In February 1904 he opened Kirmse's Jewelry Store".
    The statement says "reopened Feb 1904".
    If he bought a store, remodelled it, and then opened his own


fence_stripped=True; content[187 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the name Herman Kirmse, the date October 12, 1912, the steamer Humboldt, the Heckman wharf, or that death was instantaneous."}'


The source text mentions the largest gold nugget watch chain but does not mention its weight, the year it was built, Pat Renwick, or its current location in an Anchorage museum.

fence_stripped=True; content[207 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions the largest gold nugget watch chain but does not mention its weight, the year it was built, Pat Renwick, or its current location in an Anchorage mu'…


fence_stripped=True; content[137 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly confirms the dimensions, the painting dates, and the person who commissioned it."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[124 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains no information regarding Ham Grease Jimmy, a lucky chip, or a saloon."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[165 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states the cornerstone-laying ceremony was on August 23, 1899, and the building was finished in August 1900."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[148 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text refers to a high school with a college-preparatory curriculum, not an institution of higher education."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[125 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that McCabe College was the only granite building in Skagway."}'


The source text mentions 'dynamite imprints' but contains none of the specific details regarding Clifton, the WP&YR, railroad construction, or the front-door lintel.

fence_stripped=True; content[195 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions \'dynamite imprints\' but contains none of the specific details regarding Clifton, the WP&YR, railroad construction, or the front-door lintel."}'


The source text states it operated for two terms, which contradicts the statement's claim of three terms.

fence_stripped=True; content[135 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states it operated for two terms, which contradicts the statement\'s claim of three terms."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[136 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that on June 28, Skagway became the first city in Alaska to incorporate."}'


*   Source Text: "Melville … the U.S. District Court paid $8000 for the building on June 1, 1901 … Skagway Trail of '98 Museum opened May 27, 1961 … From 1901 until 1956... In 2000... a new addition"
    *   Statement: "U.S. paid $8,000, title June 1, 1901; museum opened May 27, 1961; addition 2000"

    *   "U.S. paid $8,000": Source says "the U.S. District Court paid $8000". (Supported)
    *   "title June 1, 1901": Source says "paid $8000 for the building on June 1, 1901". While "title" isn't explicitly used, the payment date for the building is given. However, "title" usually refers to ownership transfer. Is "paid... on June 1, 1901" equivalent to "title June 1, 1901"? In a strict sense, payment doesn't always mean title transfer, but in a summary, it's very close. Let's look at the other parts.
    *   "museum opened May 27, 1961": Source says "Skagway Trail of '98 Museum opened May 27, 1961". (Supported)
    *   "addition 2000": Source says "In 2000... a new addition". (Supported)

    *   The statement says "title June 1, 1901".
    *   The source says "paid $8000 for the building on June 1, 1901".
    *   Does "paid... on [date]" necessarily mean "title [date]"? Not necessarily, but in the context of a summary, it's often treated as such. However, the prompt says "Answer PASS only if every part of the statement is stated by the source text, or follows necessarily from it."
    *   Does "title" follow *necessarily* from "paid $8000 for the building"? No. Payment is not the same as the legal transfer of title.
    *   Wait, let's look at the phrasing again. "U.S. paid $8,000, title June 1, 1901". This could be interpreted as "The U.S. paid $8,000 [and the] title [was transferred on] June 1, 1901".
    *   If I am being extremely strict: The source text does not mention the word "title". It mentions the payment date.
    *   However, usually, in these types of tasks, if the date and the action (buying/paying) match, it's a PASS. But "title" is a specific legal term.
    *   Let's re-read: "the U.S. District Court paid $8000 for the building on June 1, 1901".
    *   Statement: "U.S. paid $8,000, title June 1, 1901".
    *   Is "title June 1, 1901" supported? The source says the payment happened then. It doesn't explicitly say the title was transferred then.
    *   But is it "too thin to tell" (UNCERTAIN) or "simply does not say it" (FAIL)?
    *   Actually, looking at the statement "U.S. paid $8,000, title June 1, 1901", it's a condensed version of "The U.S. paid $8,000 [and acquired] title [on] June 1, 1901".
    *   If the source says they paid for the building on that date, it's a very strong implication.
    *   Let's check the other parts again.
        *   Museum opened May 27, 1961 -> "Skagway Trail of '98 Museum opened May 27, 1961" (PASS)
        *   Addition 2000 -> "In 2000... a new addition" (PASS)
    *   The only sticking point is "title".
    *   If I compare "paid $8000 for the building on June 1,


fence_stripped=True; content[143 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states the date of the murder as October 27, 1902, and that Mike shot her in the back."}'


The source text provides the words of the text but does not state that they are part of a 'bust inscription'.

fence_stripped=True; content[139 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text provides the words of the text but does not state that they are part of a \'bust inscription\'."}'


The source text does not state that Packer Jack commissioned the bust, nor does it mention the date of Mollie Walsh's death or that the unveiling occurred in 1930.

fence_stripped=True; content[193 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not state that Packer Jack commissioned the bust, nor does it mention the date of Mollie Walsh\'s death or that the unveiling occurred in 1930."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[152 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the biographical details, dates, or specific burial locations mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[121 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that Mike and Mollie were married in Dawson City in 1900."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[123 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions Packer Jack but contains no information about a person named Newman."}'


The source text does not state that the Moore cabin is a 'log' cabin.

fence_stripped=True; content[99 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not state that the Moore cabin is a \'log\' cabin."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[182 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states that Ogilvie named the route, whereas the statement attributes this action to Moore and includes details not present in the text."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[129 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions that Moore put up a fight, but it does not mention a crowbar or surveyors."}'


*   Source Text: "In 1900, the Moores detached the log cabin and moved it to its present site 50 feet north of the house … The building sits west of the Moore House"
    *   Statement: "The cabin was moved a short distance within the lot"

    *   "moved it to its present site 50 feet north of the house" -> This indicates a distance of 50 feet.
    *   "within the lot" -> The text says it was moved "50 feet north of the house". It does not explicitly mention a "lot". However, moving a cabin 50 feet relative to a house usually implies it's on the same property/lot. But the prompt says "Answer PASS only if every part of the statement is stated by the source text, or follows necessarily from it."

    *   "moved a short distance": 50 feet is generally considered a short distance.
    *   "within the lot": The text says it was moved "50 feet north of the house". Does this *necessarily* mean it was moved "within the lot"? Not necessarily. It could have been moved from one lot to another, or from a public space to a lot. However, the context "the Moores detached the log cabin and moved it to its present site 50 feet north of the house" strongly suggests it was on their property. But is it *explicitly* stated or *necessarily* following?

    *   "50 feet north of the house" -> This is a specific distance.
    *   "within the lot" -> The text does not mention a "lot".

    *   If I say PASS: I'm assuming "50 feet north of the house" implies "within the lot".
    *   If I say FAIL: I'm saying the text doesn't mention a "lot".
    *   If I say UNCERTAIN: I'm saying the text is too thin to determine if it was "within the lot".

    Let's re-read: "In 1900, the Moores detached the log cabin and moved it to its present site 50 feet north of the house".
    Does "50 feet north of the house" necessarily mean "within the lot"?
    In a strict logical sense, no. It could be 50 feet north of the house but across a property line.
    However, usually, in these types of NLP tasks, "50 feet" is a "short distance". The "within the lot" part is the tricky bit.

    Wait, the prompt says: "Answer PASS only if every part of the statement is stated by the source text, or follows necessarily from it."
    The source text does not mention a "lot".

    Let's compare:
    Statement: "The cabin was moved a short distance within the lot"
    Source: "moved it to its present site 50 feet north of the house"

    Is "within the lot" stated? No.
    Does it follow necessarily? No.

    Therefore, it should be FAIL or UNCERTAIN.
    FAIL: "Answer FAIL if the source text contradicts the statement, or simply does not say it."
    The source text does not say it was "within the lot".

    Let's double-check if "50 feet north of the house" implies "within the lot".
    If I move something 50 feet from my house, am I moving it within my lot? Not necessarily.

    Verdict: FAIL (because it doesn't say "within the lot").

    Wait, let me think if "UNCERTAIN" is better.
    "Answer UNCERTAIN only if the source text is too thin to tell either way."
    The text tells us the distance (50 feet) and the direction (north of the house). It does not mention the boundaries of the lot. So we cannot tell if it was within the lot or not.

    However, the instruction says "Answer FAIL if the source text... simply does not say it."
    The source text does not say "within the lot".

    Let's look at "short distance". 50 feet is a short distance. That part is fine.
    The "within the lot" part is the missing piece.

    If the text doesn't mention the lot, it "simply does not say it".

    Let's try to be very strict.
    Source: "moved it to its present site 50 feet north of the house"
    Statement: "moved a short distance within the lot"
    "Short distance" -> 50 feet (Pass)
    "Within the lot" -> Not mentioned (Fail


The source text states patrons 'curled up in corners,' which contradicts or does not support the claim that they slept 'en masse.'

fence_stripped=True; content[160 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states patrons \'curled up in corners,\' which contradicts or does not support the claim that they slept \'en masse.\'"}'


fence_stripped=True; content[144 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the specific date of May 25, 1916, nor the phrase regarding national prohibition."}'


The source text does not mention the 'Red Front' or a '2000 reconstruction'.

fence_stripped=True; content[106 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the \'Red Front\' or a \'2000 reconstruction\'."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[164 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the specific details mentioned in the statement, such as the person, location, date, or organization."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[144 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text confirms that in 1901, the Pullen House was opened in a large home built by Captain William Moore."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[162 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the information regarding StreamWalk, its length, funding, or the grant mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[169 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions that something was installed backwards, but it does not mention dragging it around a corner or the use of a horse."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[119 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that the saloon closed after local prohibition in 1916."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[195 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text only mentions that upstairs was a brothel and a higher class parlor, providing none of the specific details regarding cribs, dolls, or a copper tube."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[134 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention that Lydia is a ghost, a former madam, or that she haunts the upstairs."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[109 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention crews, autographing, a wall, or the year 1928."}'


*   Source Text: "first rockslide on June 23, 2022, which caused minor damage to Discovery Princess … off-limits to pedestrians since the summer of 2022… shuttles or small, orange boats … almost a quarter of the traffic — or about 100,000 passengers for the rest of the season"
    *   Statement: "June 23, 2022 rockslide damaged the Discovery Princess; the dock has been closed to pedestrians since (shuttles/orange boats)"

    *   "June 23, 2022 rockslide damaged the Discovery Princess" -> Source says "first rockslide on June 23, 2022, which caused minor damage to Discovery Princess". (Matches)
    *   "the dock has been closed to pedestrians since" -> Source says "off-limits to pedestrians since the summer of 2022". (Matches, assuming "off-limits" means closed and the context implies the dock/area).
    *   "(shuttles/orange boats)" -> Source says "shuttles or small, orange boats". (Matches as a parenthetical reference to the means of transport).

    *   The source text mentions a rockslide on June 23, 2022, causing minor damage to Discovery Princess.
    *   It mentions being "off-limits to pedestrians since the summer of 2022".
    *   It mentions "shuttles or small, orange boats".
    *   The statement links these together. The source text is fragmented (indicated by ellipses), but the components are present.

    *   Does the source text explicitly say "the dock" was closed? It says "off-limits to pedestrians". While it doesn't explicitly use the word "dock", the context of a ship (Discovery Princess) and shuttles/boats strongly implies a dock or port area. However, the prompt says "Judge from the source text alone."
    *   Wait, looking closer at the source text: "...off-limits to pedestrians since the summer of 2022...". It doesn't explicitly name the "dock".
    *   However, usually, in these types of tests, if the context is clear, it's a pass. But let's be strict.
    *   Source: "off-limits to pedestrians since the summer of 2022".
    *   Statement: "the dock has been closed to pedestrians since".
    *   Is "off-limits" the same as "closed"? Yes.
    *   Is the location "the dock"? The text doesn't explicitly say "the dock", but it mentions a ship and boats.
    *   Let's re-read: "first rockslide on June 23, 2022, which caused minor damage to Discovery Princess … off-limits to pedestrians since the summer of 2022… shuttles or small, orange boats".
    *   The statement says "the dock has been closed". The source says "off-limits to pedestrians".
    *   Is it a "FAIL" because "dock" isn't mentioned? Or "PASS" because it's implied?
    *   Strictly speaking, the word "dock" is not in the source text.

    *   "June 23, 2022 rockslide damaged the Discovery Princess" -> PASS.
    *   "the dock has been closed to pedestrians since" -> The source says "off-limits to pedestrians since the summer of 2022". It does not specify *what* is off-limits.
    *   "(shuttles/orange boats)" -> PASS.

    If the source text doesn't specify *what* is off-limits, claiming "the dock" is off-limits is an inference.

    Let's look at the source again.
    "first rockslide on June 23, 2022, which caused minor damage to Discovery Princess … off-limits to pedestrians since the summer of 2022… shuttles or small, orange boats"

    The statement says "the dock has been closed".
    The source says "off-limits to pedestrians".
    It doesn't say "the dock".

    However, in many "claim-judge" tasks, if the subject is clearly implied by the context (ship, boats, passengers), it's often accepted. But the prompt says "Judge from the source text alone. A statement that is true in the world but absent from the source text is FAIL".

    Is "the dock" absent? Yes.

    Let's check if "off-limits to pedestrians" necessarily means


fence_stripped=True; content[127 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the specific names, dates, or events mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[177 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains only a location fragment and does not mention railroads, depots, dates, or the specific address provided in the statement."}'


The source text qualifies the claim with 'perhaps', while the statement presents it as a definitive fact.

fence_stripped=True; content[135 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text qualifies the claim with \'perhaps\', while the statement presents it as a definitive fact."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[155 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states the rotaries were retired in 1964, not 1965, and contains no mention of 2001 or a ceremonial clearing."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[183 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states the third floor was built circa 1902-1903 and that the dome was left intact, contradicting the claim that both were added in 1908."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[158 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text only mentions that something was transported on rollers and does not mention the year 1908, horses, or capstans."}'


The source text does not mention the person's name, the date, the location, or the specific circumstances of the death.

fence_stripped=True; content[149 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the person\'s name, the date, the location, or the specific circumstances of the death."}'


The source text explicitly states that Alaska's oldest hotel closed in 2002.

fence_stripped=True; content[106 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that Alaska\'s oldest hotel closed in 2002."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[132 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention Soapy, the date May 1898, or the duration of time the parlor was run."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[187 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the name Herman Kirmse, the date October 12, 1912, the steamer Humboldt, the Heckman wharf, or that death was instantaneous."}'


The source text mentions the largest gold nugget watch chain but does not mention its weight, the year it was built, Pat Renwick, or its current location in an Anchorage museum.

fence_stripped=True; content[207 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions the largest gold nugget watch chain but does not mention its weight, the year it was built, Pat Renwick, or its current location in an Anchorage mu'…


fence_stripped=True; content[137 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly confirms the dimensions, the painting dates, and the person who commissioned it."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[124 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains no information regarding Ham Grease Jimmy, a lucky chip, or a saloon."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[165 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states the cornerstone-laying ceremony was on August 23, 1899, and the building was finished in August 1900."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[148 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text refers to a high school with a college-preparatory curriculum, not an institution of higher education."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[125 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that McCabe College was the only granite building in Skagway."}'


The source text mentions 'dynamite imprints' but contains none of the specific details regarding Clifton, the WP&YR, railroad construction, or the front-door lintel.

fence_stripped=True; content[195 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions \'dynamite imprints\' but contains none of the specific details regarding Clifton, the WP&YR, railroad construction, or the front-door lintel."}'


The source text states it operated for two terms, which contradicts the statement's claim of three terms.

fence_stripped=True; content[135 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states it operated for two terms, which contradicts the statement\'s claim of three terms."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[136 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that on June 28, Skagway became the first city in Alaska to incorporate."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[143 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states the date of the murder as October 27, 1902, and that Mike shot her in the back."}'


The source text provides the words of the text but does not state that they are part of a 'bust inscription'.

fence_stripped=True; content[139 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text provides the words of the text but does not state that they are part of a \'bust inscription\'."}'


The source text does not state that Packer Jack commissioned the bust, nor does it mention the date of Mollie Walsh's death or that the unveiling occurred in 1930.

fence_stripped=True; content[193 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not state that Packer Jack commissioned the bust, nor does it mention the date of Mollie Walsh\'s death or that the unveiling occurred in 1930."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[152 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the biographical details, dates, or specific burial locations mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[121 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that Mike and Mollie were married in Dawson City in 1900."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[123 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions Packer Jack but contains no information about a person named Newman."}'


The source text does not state that the Moore cabin is a 'log' cabin.

fence_stripped=True; content[99 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not state that the Moore cabin is a \'log\' cabin."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[182 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states that Ogilvie named the route, whereas the statement attributes this action to Moore and includes details not present in the text."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[129 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions that Moore put up a fight, but it does not mention a crowbar or surveyors."}'


The source text states patrons 'curled up in corners,' which contradicts or does not support the claim that they slept 'en masse.'

fence_stripped=True; content[160 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states patrons \'curled up in corners,\' which contradicts or does not support the claim that they slept \'en masse.\'"}'


fence_stripped=True; content[144 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the specific date of May 25, 1916, nor the phrase regarding national prohibition."}'


The source text does not mention the 'Red Front' or a '2000 reconstruction'.

fence_stripped=True; content[106 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the \'Red Front\' or a \'2000 reconstruction\'."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[164 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the specific details mentioned in the statement, such as the person, location, date, or organization."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[144 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text confirms that in 1901, the Pullen House was opened in a large home built by Captain William Moore."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[162 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the information regarding StreamWalk, its length, funding, or the grant mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[169 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions that something was installed backwards, but it does not mention dragging it around a corner or the use of a horse."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[119 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that the saloon closed after local prohibition in 1916."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[195 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text only mentions that upstairs was a brothel and a higher class parlor, providing none of the specific details regarding cribs, dolls, or a copper tube."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[134 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention that Lydia is a ghost, a former madam, or that she haunts the upstairs."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[109 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention crews, autographing, a wall, or the year 1928."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[127 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the specific names, dates, or events mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[177 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains only a location fragment and does not mention railroads, depots, dates, or the specific address provided in the statement."}'


The source text qualifies the claim with 'perhaps', while the statement presents it as a definitive fact.

fence_stripped=True; content[135 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text qualifies the claim with \'perhaps\', while the statement presents it as a definitive fact."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[155 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states the rotaries were retired in 1964, not 1965, and contains no mention of 2001 or a ceremonial clearing."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[183 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states the third floor was built circa 1902-1903 and that the dome was left intact, contradicting the claim that both were added in 1908."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[158 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text only mentions that something was transported on rollers and does not mention the year 1908, horses, or capstans."}'


The source text does not mention the person's name, the date, the location, or the specific circumstances of the death.

fence_stripped=True; content[149 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the person\'s name, the date, the location, or the specific circumstances of the death."}'


The source text explicitly states that Alaska's oldest hotel closed in 2002.

fence_stripped=True; content[106 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that Alaska\'s oldest hotel closed in 2002."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[132 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention Soapy, the date May 1898, or the duration of time the parlor was run."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[187 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the name Herman Kirmse, the date October 12, 1912, the steamer Humboldt, the Heckman wharf, or that death was instantaneous."}'


The source text mentions the largest gold nugget watch chain but does not mention its weight, the year it was built, Pat Renwick, or its current location in an Anchorage museum.

fence_stripped=True; content[207 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions the largest gold nugget watch chain but does not mention its weight, the year it was built, Pat Renwick, or its current location in an Anchorage mu'…


fence_stripped=True; content[137 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly confirms the dimensions, the painting dates, and the person who commissioned it."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[124 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains no information regarding Ham Grease Jimmy, a lucky chip, or a saloon."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[165 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states the cornerstone-laying ceremony was on August 23, 1899, and the building was finished in August 1900."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[148 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text refers to a high school with a college-preparatory curriculum, not an institution of higher education."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[125 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that McCabe College was the only granite building in Skagway."}'


The source text mentions 'dynamite imprints' but contains none of the specific details regarding Clifton, the WP&YR, railroad construction, or the front-door lintel.

fence_stripped=True; content[195 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions \'dynamite imprints\' but contains none of the specific details regarding Clifton, the WP&YR, railroad construction, or the front-door lintel."}'


The source text states it operated for two terms, which contradicts the statement's claim of three terms.

fence_stripped=True; content[135 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states it operated for two terms, which contradicts the statement\'s claim of three terms."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[136 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that on June 28, Skagway became the first city in Alaska to incorporate."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[143 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states the date of the murder as October 27, 1902, and that Mike shot her in the back."}'


The source text provides the words of the text but does not state that they are part of a 'bust inscription'.

fence_stripped=True; content[139 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text provides the words of the text but does not state that they are part of a \'bust inscription\'."}'


The source text does not state that Packer Jack commissioned the bust, nor does it mention the date of Mollie Walsh's death or that the unveiling occurred in 1930.

fence_stripped=True; content[193 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not state that Packer Jack commissioned the bust, nor does it mention the date of Mollie Walsh\'s death or that the unveiling occurred in 1930."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[152 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the biographical details, dates, or specific burial locations mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[121 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that Mike and Mollie were married in Dawson City in 1900."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[123 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions Packer Jack but contains no information about a person named Newman."}'


The source text does not state that the Moore cabin is a 'log' cabin.

fence_stripped=True; content[99 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not state that the Moore cabin is a \'log\' cabin."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[182 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states that Ogilvie named the route, whereas the statement attributes this action to Moore and includes details not present in the text."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[129 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions that Moore put up a fight, but it does not mention a crowbar or surveyors."}'


The source text states patrons 'curled up in corners,' which contradicts or does not support the claim that they slept 'en masse.'

fence_stripped=True; content[160 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text states patrons \'curled up in corners,\' which contradicts or does not support the claim that they slept \'en masse.\'"}'


fence_stripped=True; content[144 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the specific date of May 25, 1916, nor the phrase regarding national prohibition."}'


The source text does not mention the 'Red Front' or a '2000 reconstruction'.

fence_stripped=True; content[106 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention the \'Red Front\' or a \'2000 reconstruction\'."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[164 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the specific details mentioned in the statement, such as the person, location, date, or organization."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[144 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text confirms that in 1901, the Pullen House was opened in a large home built by Captain William Moore."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[162 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the information regarding StreamWalk, its length, funding, or the grant mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[169 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text mentions that something was installed backwards, but it does not mention dragging it around a corner or the use of a horse."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[119 chars]='{"verdict": "PASS", "why": "The source text explicitly states that the saloon closed after local prohibition in 1916."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[195 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text only mentions that upstairs was a brothel and a higher class parlor, providing none of the specific details regarding cribs, dolls, or a copper tube."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[134 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention that Lydia is a ghost, a former madam, or that she haunts the upstairs."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[109 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text does not mention crews, autographing, a wall, or the year 1928."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[127 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains none of the specific names, dates, or events mentioned in the statement."}'


fence_stripped=True; content[177 chars]='{"verdict": "FAIL", "why": "The source text contains only a location fragment and does not mention railroads, depots, dates, or the specific address provided in the statement."}'