{
 "registered_integers": {
  "COVE_ANCHOR_CELLS": 42,
  "COVE_ANCHOR_LETTERS_PER_SEAT": 6,
  "COVE_ARMS": 4,
  "COVE_ARM_CALLS": 36,
  "COVE_ARM_CELLS": 224,
  "COVE_ARM_LETTERS_PER_SEAT": 32,
  "COVE_ASKS": 6,
  "COVE_AUDITIONS_PER_SEAT": 1,
  "COVE_CELLS_PER_FRONTIER_ARM": 56,
  "COVE_CELLS_PER_RECUSED_ARM": 48,
  "COVE_CLUSTERS": 6,
  "COVE_CONTEXT_RATIO_FLOOR": 0.8,
  "COVE_CONTEXT_RULE_MIN_ARMS_WITH_COUNTERS": 3,
  "COVE_FAMILIES": 7,
  "COVE_FAMILIES_PER_FRONTIER_ARM": 7,
  "COVE_FAMILIES_PER_RECUSED_ARM": 6,
  "COVE_FLOOR_FAMILIES": 4,
  "COVE_JUDGE_CALLS": 49,
  "COVE_JUDGE_CALLS_PER_SEAT": 7,
  "COVE_JUDGE_CALLS_WITH_REMINDERS": 59,
  "COVE_LETTERS_PER_SEAT": 38,
  "COVE_LETTERS_PER_SHEET": [
   9,
   9,
   5,
   5,
   5,
   5
  ],
  "COVE_PARTIAL_CARRY_UNRANKED_AT_OR_BELOW": 3,
  "COVE_PERCENT_FLOOR": 30,
  "COVE_RECUSED_CELLS": 16,
  "COVE_RECUSING_CHAIRS": 2,
  "COVE_REMINDERS_PER_PAGE": 1,
  "COVE_REMINDER_ALLOWANCE": 0.2,
  "COVE_REPLIES_PER_ARM": 8,
  "COVE_ROUND_ID": "two-frontiers-cove-r1",
  "COVE_SAMPLES": [
   2,
   2,
   1,
   1,
   1,
   1
  ],
  "COVE_SAMPLE_CAP_PER_SHEET": 24,
  "COVE_SCORED_REPLIES": 32,
  "COVE_SCORING_CELLS": 208,
  "COVE_SEATS": 7,
  "COVE_SEAT_PAIRS": 21,
  "COVE_SHEETS": 6,
  "COVE_VERDICT_OBJECTS": 266,
  "COVE_WARMUPS": 4,
  "COVE_WARMUPS_PER_ARM": 1
 },
 "refusals": {
  "within_arm_spread_on_the_two_n2_asks": "NOT-RUN — the pinned scorer's `per_seat` projection carries no `sample` field, so no per-sample figure exists in scores.json and none can be derived from it. What publishes is the per-ask figure with both samples POOLED (`by_ask`) and its denominator; the raw per-letter verdicts in the kit's judge tree do carry `sample`, so a reader who wants the spread can compute it from published bytes and this page does not.",
  "per_ask_between_seat_anchor_spread": "NOT-RUN as a SCORER field — `anchor_report` groups by SCENARIO and this round has two asks per scenario, so its `by_scenario[*]` reports 14 seats for a seven-seat panel and its spread pools two DIFFERENT anchor replies. The report layer below re-groups the scorer's own anchor cells by (seat, ask) so all 36 that EXIST are kept — six asks × the six seats that sat — against the 42 a seven-seat panel would have filed; the difference is the retired chair (A6) and not a missing reading. The scorer's own by-scenario grouping is NOT printed: it pools two different anchor replies, which is the reason this field is NOT-RUN in the first place, and a row accounting for an absence must not promise a figure the page does not carry.",
  "four_arm_common_panel": "NOT-RUN — it would be five families, and for the two frontier arms that is a leave-TWO-out figure the pinned scorer does not compute. The glm and gemma arms' own five-family figures DO exist (a single leave-one-out from each) and are used only for the glm-vs-local pairing registered below."
 },
 "inherited_and_unused": {
  "tie_band_applications.*.curation_pair": {
   "what": "the ancestor's §11 card-selection rule: the TWO HIGHEST family-means as cards plus the SINGLE LOWEST as a named honest slot",
   "why_unused": "this round retires that rule. Its cards are the author's picks, labelled as picks, and no card is chosen by figure. With four arms a two-highest card plus a named lowest IS a podium over the rows.",
   "kit": "STRIPPED from the kit copy: `cards`, `figures` and `lowest_slot`."
  },
  "local_judge_axis": {
   "what": "the local-vs-hosted agreement axis, with its how-to-read and confound prose",
   "why_unused": "this panel seats NO local-ollama judge, so `local_seats` is empty and the field's three hardcoded strings describe AUGUST's panel — one locally hosted seat, three gemma arms, a format-reminder rate — none of which is true here. `hosted_to_hosted` would summarise all 21 pairs.",
   "kit": "STRIPPED from the kit copy: the prose keys. The pair figures stay."
  },
  "counting_rules.tie_band.basis": {
   "what": "TIE_BAND_BASIS, the band's registered justification",
   "why_unused": "it reads 'at three moments and one sample per cell'. This round has SIX judged asks, two of them at two samples, so the inherited sentence describes a different instrument. The band is NOT re-tuned — re-tuning a band after the instrument changed is the tuning a pre-registration exists to prevent — and the direction of the mismatch is the safe one: more moments cannot resolve worse than fewer, so 0.5 is an upper bound on what this exam can separate.",
   "kit": "STRIPPED from the kit copy, replaced by this round's own basis paragraph."
  }
 },
 "forbidden_claims": [
  "No ORDERING among the four arms, in any table, in any direction. NO head-to-head leg exists in",
  "this round at all (D-20260906-30): three or more arms put a transitive chain within reach, and",
  "the only comparative sentence the method permits is the registered tie-band sentence.",
  "No interval anywhere -- the independent unit is the CASE and N = 6 clusters.",
  "No percentage under N=30, in words (counted()'s own floor).",
  "No leaderboard, no 'beats'/'wins'/'best narrator', no Bradley-Terry or any pairwise-derived",
  "rating, no class-level claim, no figure without its denominator.",
  "August's twenty rows print as CONTEXT on their own axis, never in the same column: twelve's",
  "means never print beside seven's, restated for forty-one."
 ]
}